What Cuts?

October 21, 2010 at 12:30 am

That graph says it all really. The level of spiralling and unsustainable spending doom isn’t really changing at all.

Where were the real cuts today? It was all a bit wimpish in the end. One of these every year until 2014 might have made a difference but today’s CSR won’t. All the easy wins are there in theory, but not a huge amount more. A cash terms spending rise is a feeble effort and there is so much waste around we should have been able to cut 10% without trying, 15% with a moderate effort, and 20% if we were prepared to cause some small amount of pain.

The pain as foretold implied much more than we saw today, which is why even al-Beeb ended up blathering about the biggest cuts ’since the 1970s’ having started off the day using ’since the Second World War’. Nick Robinson even noted that statisticians have worked out Labour’s IMF debacle resulted in bigger cuts than we’ve had today. The BBC as a whole though, was a Labour Party Political Broadcast from start to finish.

Still, the CSR has produced some gems from the Guardian: “..Nearly half of all black Caribbean women, and 37% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi women, are employed in the public sector. I’m concerned that ethnic minority women will be hit very hard by the spending cuts..” implying that the cuts are ‘racist’ as well in the weird world of the Guardian pointy-heads. Awww.