Rough Justice
This blog has commented previously on the upcoming trial of alleged mass murderer John Demjanjuk – due to start on November 30 in Munich. It is right to ask about the likelihood of an unfair process considering someone else has also been identified as the notorious SS guard “Ivan The Terrible”. This increasingly tenuous trial has hit another setback when it emerged yesterday that it will take place without any eyewitnesses.
Weekly German magazine Focus reported that although 23 witnesses had been named, and five from Russia and Ukraine had been expected, they are long-dead. His defence lawyer Günther Maull told the magazine witness statements had been produced, but added, “The men were questioned 30 years ago – at least in part in the Soviet Union and possibly under pressure. Whether their statements have any value as evidence is questionable.”
Demjanjuk is accused of assisting in 27,900 murders during his time as a guard in the Sobibor concentration camp in what was then Poland, during 1943. He emigrated to the USA after the end of the war, and fought extradition to Germany. His family argued that his ill health should preclude a trial.
He was sentenced to death by an Israeli court two decades ago after he was convicted of being the feared death camp guard known as “Ivan the Terrible” who would hack at naked prisoners with a sword and inflict cruel and sadistic punishments, but that ruling was overturned in 1993 when statements from other guards identified another man as “Ivan.”
So, is justice to be served by going ahead with this trial? It seems that beyond reasonable doubt is being set aside in the name of vengeance…even if it is to be taken against what could be an innocent man.
The thing that really needs testing is wheher this really is ” Ivan the terrible” and if they can’t completly establish that he should be freed.
0 likes
I’m wondering just how they can even go about establishing that he is or is not “Ivan the Terrible” with so much time having passed! It’s not like they have any DNA to compare – this sounds more like a lynching!
0 likes
Considering the Israelis decided that he was and then he wasn’t – on the basis of eyewitnesses – then, especially without any this time round, reasonable doubt is definitely in play here.
I don’t hold with the argument of not prosecuting someone because of their age…if you did something this heinous then you did it. But every trial must be fair, and this one, in my opinion, can’t be if you have no conclusive way to show that you are even trying the right man.
0 likes
I wonder if the prosecution will try to exclude the Israeli identification and subsequent retraction and acquittal as being ‘prejudicial’. Assuming that double jeopardy doesn’t apply because it is (tenchnically) different cimes being charged in different jurisdictions, would a Not Guilty verdict mean he could be passed on to, for example, Russia, for them to have a third go?
Yes, this sounds more and more like a state-sanctioned lynching.
0 likes