Kerry McCarthy Is A Moron
And so the beat goes on…..*sigh*. A contribution today from one of the most badly assembled human beings ever made – for it is she:
A MP has backed calls for the DNA screening of all men in Bristol as part of the hunt for the murderer of Jo Yeates.
What, all quarter of a million of them? Really?
Bristol East Labour MP Kerry McCarthy said if police thought the exercise was worthwhile she believed most men would understand why they were being asked.
Still not dropped the national DNA database idea have you? Totalitarian witch. It’s fortunate that officialdom is so efficient and reliable, which is what makes this such a great idea. Not.
Ms McCarthy said she believed the majority of people would be sympathetic to requests for DNA samples.
All men are guilty! All men are guilty! Burn them! If they don’t ‘volunteer’, burn them twice!
She added: “But rather than taking DNA just from men in the Clifton area, where the population is somewhat transient, the operation should be widened to include the whole of the city.
“Quite how the police would organise this I don’t know,” she added.
Right, so you don’t know how…oh, whatever. Stupid, stupid, stupid. If this woman ever gets near the corridors of power again it’s torchlight parade of angry toothless peasants time.
UPDATE: The Police are taking DNA samples from Joanna Yeates’ Facebook friends. The moral of that story is that if you know someone via Facebook – however vaguely – who is then murdered, you should drop them sharpish or someone will be knocking on your door with mouth swabs. Because you “surely you have nothing to hide…”?
“Ms McCarthy said she believed the majority of people would be sympathetic to requests for DNA samples.”
How would she know? Has the man hating bitch ever asked any of us???
She can fuck right off – preferably to an undiscovered part of the solar system….
0 likes
Somewhere, a village is looking for an idiot!
0 likes
She can go fuck herself, so to speak, and anyway why on earth is McCarthy still even allowed to be an MP after being found guilty of Electoral Fraud, back in May.
In the circumstances, I rather thought that the following might be a rather approriate piece of attire for the braindead moron …..
0 likes
“Quite how the police would organise this I don’t know,” she added.
Well until you’ve actually spent some time thinking before uttering such unmitigated shite ..
I suggest you shut the fuck up and concentrate on matters more within your somewhat limited capabilities .. like washing, ironing or dropping sprogs ..
0 likes
This has occurred in the U.S. before on a smaller basis in search of a rapist and of course all men are guilty of this charge?
Fight this tooth and nail!
Think about it, if they have your DNA they can place anyone at anytime at any scene of any crime guilty or not! >:o
If they (the government) wants to silence and persecute anyone for any reason they will indeed use this method so the public at large will see it has evidence and thus legal prosecution.
0 likes
No possibility then that the killer is female? Or someone no longer in Bristol?
0 likes
Shakes heasd in total disbelief.
The problem is ASE that there will be people within society who will parrot the usual – “If you’ve got nothing to hide..” bollox.
The sad reality that many people are 100% oblivious to seeing is that once they have your DNA – THEY OWN YOU COMPLETELY. People simply trust far too much and sadly, they trust the very people whom they most certainly shouldn’t be.
Picture the scene – an activist against the NWO and police state is rapidly rising within the country. His mesage is getting across and people are beginning to wake up. All of a sudden he’s arrested and taken in for questioning as the police state that he’s been charged as DNA evidence was found upon the victim and her badly bruised and beaten body. And people won’t think he’s been framed, merely parrot the MSM that says he’s a psychopath, rapist paedophile in order to discredit him and his work.
And this is how easily the situation evolves (devolves). Forget about a nuclear bomb used to smash a nut. This is all about total oppression of society through total control.
0 likes
Asked?? Asked?? I’m not sure what you’s getting at dave.
These people know *better* than us. You must be aware of that, they’ve told you often enough. There’s no asking involved.
0 likes
I wouldn’t go as far as ‘looking’. There’s no evidence that anyone wants her back. A few posters up on lampposts, nothing more.
0 likes
It turns out that neither breaking electoral law nor being an idiot are bars to being an MP. Colour me shocked. Although she does prove the role that people get the MP they deserve.
0 likes
MP Opens Mouth Without Thinking Shocker. But in a way I don’t mind her talking rather than, as you suggest, dropping sprogs…anything to keep that DNA from being passed on is a good thing.
0 likes
It seems not. It’s a nailed on fact that the killer lives just down the road and would be delighted to pop into a testing station. There were no accomplices, no-one was randomly in the flat ever before and none of the 74 large-booted policeman who have strolled through the crime scene have affected it in any way.
0 likes
I’ve heard about this being done in small towns in the USA Christopher, yes, and it alarmed me then. As Harbinger rightly says below, the tyranny of “Nothing to hide” is a dangerous one and open to huge abuse.
When combined with the scientific inexperience of a typical jury, the merest mention of DNA is likely to close the case in their minds. Any questions about how is got there or whether it got there at all will be lost in the mix.
This is a very slippery slope, and one that many MPs over here have been historically very keen on. It mustn’t be brought in by stealth.
0 likes
I saw a comment on another site which was so mind-numbingly wrong that I think for a moment my eyes started to bleed. It was suggested, without hint of sarcasm that “we wouldn’t have this problem if we took DNA from every new born baby and kept it on a register“.
Really. There are people out there who honestly think like that. People who imagine that having a barcode on the back of your neck will solve all of the world’s problems.
It’s hard to figure out if they are just useful idiots or part of the class who intend to be in control of such things.
My DNA belongs to me and I intend it to stay that way.
0 likes
I wonder if the ‘fragrant’ Ms. McCarthy has considered what would the attitude of the police be when one of the ‘chosen five thousand’ decides to stand upon his ‘Yooman Rites’ and tell the DNa-search team to go fly a kite, or move off in a series of short, rapid movements, or any other version of stating that he does not have to prove his innocence; the police have to prove guilt!
Just imagine, instead of a ‘blue-haired intellectual ex-school teacher’ they now have an even more prized specimen: ‘Someone who will not co-operate’.
They would probably either just hang him, or leave him to the tender mercies of the same bunch who did not know what a paeadiatrician was; apart, that is from sounding dead posh and suspiciously like ‘paeadohphile’!
0 likes
I’m sure that Jo was a lovely lady who did not deserve to be murdered but I’ve been wondering why this particular case has been deemed worthy of so much attention when, after all, people get killed every day.
McCarthys pronouncement (at her NWO masters request) perhaps provides the answer. Create a ’cause celebre’, young Jo, whip up huge public anxiety and Bobs youre uncle, DNA swabs all round, coming to your town soon as accepted custom & practise.
0 likes
Ah, indeed. Your card you’d be marked as “something to hide” and “uncooperative”. Stand by for a bit of digging into your past and the rubber glove treatment.
It’s for your own good and the good of society, remember!
0 likes
I don’t think you’re anywhere near tinfoil hat territory there. It sounds horribly plausible. As Rahm said in the US not so long ago – never let a good crisis go to waste.
0 likes