Now Personal Hygiene Is Evil
The beauty of the global warming hoax is that it allows socialists to wallow in their trademark neurotic guilt, baseless sanctimony, and hostility to civilization while imposing all elements of their agenda – including deliberately excessive taxation, suppression of the private sector, totalitarian power for Big Government, degradation of our standard of living, elevation of animals over humans, and even the rejection of personal hygiene that progressives indulged in so flagrantly and so fragrantly during their halcyon days in the 60s.
World-renowned high priest of the climate change cult Dr. Dave Reay, Senior Lecturer in Carbon Management at Edinburgh University, has been loudly denouncing the Gaia-oppressing habits of bathing and washing clothes. Proclaims Reay:
For the largest cuts [in harmless carbon emissions], simply washing less frequently is the way to go.
Washing your clothes less often is important too:
Advertisers [have] convinced us that our shirts must always be “whiter than white”, our sheets should forever smell of spring flowers, and that to be dressed in freshly laundered clothes at all times is a badge of success. We live in a “wear once and wash” culture.
It is easy to see how these emissions stack up. A full load in a washing machine uses around 1.2 kilowatt-hours of electricity per cycle and tumble drying clocks up a further 3.5 kilowatt-hours, resulting in over 2 kilograms of [yap yap yap yap…]
Buying new clothes when the old ones haven’t yet been worn to rags is also an eco-crime, according to Raey. Oh, and so is drinking coffee. Medieval peasants didn’t drink coffee, so we shouldn’t either – since our Warmist ruling class expects us to emulate a 14th century serf’s lifestyle.
Oi, Dr Davey Dirt!
YOU might like poncing around stinking to high heaven in an unhygenic, disheveled state but I don’t. I’ll tell you what though, when our less than frugal MPs start to take up your ‘great unwashed’ scheme, and therefore lead by example for a bloody change, then I MIGHT consider it.
In the meantime, feck the fecking feck off you filthy fecker.
Ta!
I don’t give a flying fuck about his 1.2 kilowatt-hours of electricity per cycle.
I do not give a fuck if my clean clothes,having a bath or going for a shit is harmful to the enviroment.FUCK IT.No fucker on this fucking earth is going to deny me the RIGHT to stay clean.
Well lets face it, they must be boring each other to death with self agreement in Copenhagen; the only way to get heard will be by ever more ludicrous ideas such as this. Mind you, the kids will love it.
I’d love to shove a few kilowatts up that twat’s arse – that should clean him out!! >:o
Either boring themselves to death or all standing in a circle and keeping themselves mutually occupied in other ways, but I bet if you had a quid for every hockey stick graph in sight you’d be a rich bloke by now.
I’ve got a horrible vaccuum cleaner hosepipe mental image now, which I DON’T appreciate at all mate and really didn’t need. Thanks a lot. No, really.
The advantage to us normal people is that smelling like that he can’t sneak up on us undetected, even in the dark. One advantage of cleanliness is the ability to stealthily approach climahysterics at night armed only with a sharp knife and a righteous anger. And showering helps get the tofu splatters off afterwards too.
Interesting lateral thinking to link it with today’s new expenses stuff but I really didn’t want the idea in my head that he smells because he doesn’t have 20,000 pounds available to clean Quentin Davies’ bell-end. It’s a thought too far.